STAY TUNED FOR THE NEXT COLLEGIATE SPACE COMPETITION

2023 - 2024 COLLEGIATE SPACE COMPETITION

Introduction

We are at a critical time in humanity’s adoption of space as the next domain to explore, economically develop, and ultimately support life. For the US to lead, ensuring both free access to space and a promising future into the cosmos, we must address this century’s biggest spaceborne challenges and invest in the next generation of talent. The Small Sat Alliance (SSA) invites tomorrow’s space leaders – today’s college students – to propose solutions to 21st century space challenges as it launches its 2nd annual Collegiate Space Competition (CSC).

About SmallSat Alliance (SSA)

The SmallSat Alliance includes a collection of 50+ successful and innovative companies of the US small satellite ecosystem, including satellite manufacturers, operators, payload providers, launch service providers, ground, and data analytics providers, and more. The low cost and availability of these products and services allows for highly capable satellite constellations utilizing novel technology developed by SSA members. The large number of participating companies in the SmallSat Alliance also amplifies our collective voice in the halls of Congress. The ultimate goal of the Alliance, and its sponsorship of the CSC, is to promote next generation smallsat technology to solve US Government and global challenges.

Technical Solutions, In Policy Contexts

In a small deviation from last year, which featured separate technical and policy entries, CSC 2024 will focus on a combined emphasis of both policy and technical elements to address 21st century challenges. By merging the two, SSA hopes to develop well-rounded future space leaders by encouraging students to think through their technical solutions in the context of current governance and policy challenges facing the commercial space industry.

Subject Areas

This year, the CSC will revisit two topics*, Orbital Debris and Environmental Monitoring, for students to propose solutions to. Students may participate as individuals or as a team (up to 5 people per team) to craft a dynamic response to one of the topics below that includes technical and policy considerations: 

  1. Space Congestion & Orbital Debris
  2. Earth Science & Environmental Monitoring

*Note: For those students/teams who have submitted before, you may not reply to a prompt for which you’ve already submitted with the same/similar content or approach; however, we encourage returning students to submit entirely new and original responses given that there are many approaches to solving these challenges.

1. Space Congestion & Orbital Debris

Background

With the rapid proliferation of affordable satellites and more accessible launch, the growing number of smallsats in space is staggering. According to the Index of Objects Launched into Outer Space, maintained by the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA), today there are nearly 12,000 operational satellites orbiting Earth, and anywhere from 50-60 thousand expected by 2030, more if Elon Musk’s Starlink ambitions are fully realized. With this explosive growth comes a flood of logistical challenges – for a burgeoning space industry, orbital debris is chief among them.

Remnants of old rockets, debris from collisions, decommissioned satellites, and the growing number of active small satellites all contribute to an increasingly congested space domain. As orbits become more and more congested, the concern of limited space and spectrum in LEO is quickly becoming an issue. Countries and corporations are launching satellites with limited incentive or understanding of how to safely dispose of smallsats at the end of their mission, resulting in a large percentage of satellites in orbit that are no longer operational with no end-of-life plans. This problem has extended to Earth’s surface, too. In 2021, Chinese rocket debris fell from space and landed near the Maldives in one of the largest space debris incidents in recent history, and several incidents in India, Australia, and Japan since. Without a resolution to problem, the increasing number of satellites launched in the coming years will only continue to exacerbate the threat of orbital debris.

Propose a realistic and environmentally conscious solution to dispose of old rocket and satellite debris. Review existing approaches and gaps to describe how your unique approach uses smallsat technology to solve the problem in a new way. Discuss your scale-up strategy, and policy contexts and implications of your design approach. 

A full solution to this prompt must contain the following sections. There is a limit of 15 pages double spaced not including Appendix or graphics.

  • Problem Statement and Background: Demonstrate a clear understanding of the issues surrounding the challenge. Why does the problem exist, and what factors make it worse? When do we reach a tipping point? Establish an incentive for solving the problem and set the scene for the gap(s) that you ultimately solve with your design approach.
  • Solutions (Literature) Review: What space-based solutions or studies currently exist (private side or active government programs) to deorbit or remove orbital debris? What parties (civil, commercial, military space…) are involved to help solve the problem? Include a discussion of primary sources and their influence on your final design.
  • Approach to Design Challenge: How might small satellite technology be employed in new ways to dispose of old rocket and satellite debris? Give a thorough description of the team’s work, including a description of the technical systems engineering or policy approaches as appropriate to solving the problem. How is your solution unique or different from existing technologies? What gap does it solve, how can this help mitigate the threat, and at what scale? Describe how the technical aspects of the Design Challenge are addressed through models, policy, or programming excerpts, etc. as appropriate to provide evidence of a thorough design process. 
  • Leveraging the Small Sat Community: Throughout the research process, you will find countless examples of companies working together across industry and government to investigate new approaches. Your team should likewise engage with industry, and identify contacts and interactions required to implement your solution. Provide a description of interactions with government, academia, and industry smallsat experts and contacts as part of the design process. How much of your solution utilizes commercial off the shelf smallsat technology to address this concern? Are there any member companies of the SmallSat Alliance that could work together to advance your idea? Please reach out to SSA/CSC reps to be connected to specific member companies within the Alliance, should their goals align with your solution.
  • Scale-Up Strategy: What is the commercial potential for your approach to the problem? What steps would you need to bring the commoditized design to the product or implementation state? This section should provide a realistic approach to scaling your solution across government and commercial customers alike and include projected cost/benefit determination for your solution, emphasizing affordability and utility.
  • Policy Contexts:
    •  During your research or conversations with industry, do specific goals or obstacles related to policy come up? If so, describe in what context.
    • What national or international policies could help with orbital debris generally? Are there policies that need to change to promote your solution specifically?
    •  Should governments place regulations on how private companies utilize available orbital slots in space? If so, what kind of regulatory and governance model should be adopted to ensure orbits are allocated equitably worldwide? If not, please explain what regulatory environment would best support your proposed solution. If one does not adhere to the proposed policy regulations, what actions would be taken and under what authority?
  • Implications of Design Approach: Describe the projected impacts of the team’s design and emphasize findings with a thorough discussion of how the solution meets the goals of the Small Sat Alliance and its member companies.

2. Earth Science & Environmental Monitoring

Background

There is a consensus among environmental scientists that our climate is changing, with adverse effects on ocean health, air quality, and rising average global temperatures. With the advent of widely available space technology, however, we’re making more sense of our changing world and climate. Constellations of smallsats can measure, monitor, and map the characteristics of the Earth’s environment for a wide range of benefits. Space technology helps to measure water quality and air pollution and assess post-event damage and emergency response planning. Real-time mapping of soil and crops allows farmers to understand crop status, predict yields, plan for harvest, and optimize treatments, which can help boost local industries in regions that are heavily dependent on climate patterns and agriculture. 

Satellite-based carbon observations are especially valuable to bridging information gaps and guiding policies to drive lower carbon emissions. In particular, smallsat missions that monitor our changing climate by observing the health of our soils and oceans, which can capture atmospheric carbon and alleviate some of the more catastrophic climate change predictions. Healthy soil can extract carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it underground. By preventing carbon from entering the atmosphere, soil can help to decelerate the pace of global warming. Oceans play a critical role in regulating climate change, too. Given that over 70% of our planet’s surface is covered by oceans, satellite technology is an excellent way to measure oceanic carbon across such a vast area.

Propose a realistic solution employing small satellite technology or space data to help measure either moisture/nitrogen in healthy soil OR oceanic carbon cycles/health of oceans. Review existing approaches and gaps to describe how your unique approach uses smallsat technology to solve the problem in a new way. Discuss your scale-up strategy, and policy contexts and implications of your design approach. For your submission, please focus on one area – land or sea – to discuss.

A full solution to this prompt must contain the following sections. There is a limit of 15 pages double spaced not including Appendix or graphics.

  • Problem Statement and Background: Demonstrate a clear understanding of the issues surrounding the challenge. Why does the problem exist, and what factors make it worse? When do we reach a tipping point? Establish an incentive for solving the problem and set the scene for the gap(s) that you ultimately solve with your design approach.
  • Solutions (Literature) Review: What space-based solutions or studies currently exist (private side or active government programs) to deorbit or remove orbital debris? What parties (civil, commercial, military space…) are involved to help solve the problem? Include a discussion of primary sources and their influence on your final design.
  • Approach to Design Challenge: How might small satellite technology be employed in new ways to help assess moisture and nitrogen for healthier soil, measure oceanic carbon cycles and assess the health of oceans and sea wildlife? Supply a thorough description of the team’s work, including a description of the technical systems engineering or policy approaches as appropriate to solving the problem. How is your solution unique or different from existing technologies? What gap does it solve, how can this help mitigate the threat, and at what scale? Describe how the technical aspects of the Design Challenge are addressed through models, policy, or programming excerpts, etc. as appropriate to provide evidence of a thorough design process. 
  • Leveraging the Small Sat Community: Throughout the research process, you will find countless examples of companies working together across industry and government to investigate new approaches. Your team should likewise engage with industry, and identify contacts and interactions required to implement your solution. Provide a description of interactions with government, academia, and industry smallsat experts and contacts as part of the design process. How much of your solution utilizes commercial off the shelf smallsat technology to address this concern? Are there any member companies of the SmallSat Alliance that could work together to advance your idea? Please reach out to SSA/CSC reps to be connected to specific member companies within the Alliance, should their goals align with your solution.
  • Scale-Up Strategy: What is the commercial potential for your approach to the problem? What steps would you need to bring the commoditized design to the product or implementation state? This section should provide a realistic approach to scaling your solution across government and commercial customers alike and include projected cost/benefit analysis, emphasizing affordability and utility.
  • Policy Contexts:
    • During your research or conversations with industry, do specific goals or obstacles related to policy come up? If so, describe in what context.
    • Are there national or international policies that need to change in order to promote your technical solution?
    • Every local government/state has a different need (based on their climate, soil type, etc.). What is the best way to address the unique space data needs of different regions and governments? How can state and local governments capitalize and promote this growing industry to provide sorely needed insight into environmental changes within their borders?
  • Implications of Design Approach: Describe the projected impacts of the team’s design and emphasize findings with a thorough discussion of how the solution meets the goals of the Small Sat Alliance and its member companies.

Helpful Resources

Notice on Unoriginal/Generated Content

Submissions found with any unoriginal content, including content sourced online or from previous submissions, or with the assistance of AI or other generator tools, will be ineligible for reward and resubmission in subsequent competitions.

For returning teams – this includes content from your own submissions last year. Both challenges and relevant topics have evolved in the last year, and your literature reviews should likewise be different and reflect recent events, companies and projects trying to solve them.

Notice of Non-Partisan Responses

The SmallSat Alliance is a non-partisan entity, and solutions are expected to challenge the status quo while maintaining a non-partisan description.

Submission Guidelines

Participants should review all necessary competition information on the SmallSat Alliance CSC website. 

The final Design Submission must contain the following: 

  • Cover page: Include title, team member name(s), education level(s), advisor name(s), and sponsoring university
  • Distribution statement: Indicate whether or not your team grants permission for Small Sat Alliance to publish your names, schools, and papers if selected as a finalist.
  • Executive Summary: Limit to one page maximum. Abstract for rest of paper, focus on the technical design, but also touch on the policy arguments you will make.
  • Table of Contents: Include page numbers for each section and appendices
  • Main body of submission (15 pages maximum): The main body of the Design Submission must contain the following sections.
      • Problem Statement and Background
      • Solutions (Literature) Review
      • Approach to Design Challenge
      • Leveraging the Small Sat Community
      • Scale-Up Strategy
      • Policy Contexts
      • Implications of Design Approach
  • Appendices: Appendices A-F are required but are not included in the page limit. No other material may be included as an appendix except those specified below.
      • Appendix A: List of complete contact information (use permanent addresses) for all advisors and team members. Include email, fax, and phone numbers. This information is crucial as all award checks are mailed directly to the individual participants, not the school.
      • Appendix B: Description (roughly one page) of the university or college and program of study.
      • Appendix C: Description of the industry experts who provided advice and feedback for your design process.
      • Appendix D: Evaluation of the educational experience provided by the project – for both student and faculty.
      • Appendix E: Reference list with full citations using APA or another standard format.

Formatting Guidelines

Double-spaced, single-sided, minimum 12-point type, Times New Roman or Helvetica font. Captions and charts may be at a minimum of 10-point type. Pages, including appendices, must be numbered, and referenced in Table of Contents.

Submission Due Date & Address

The design package shall be submitted following the guidelines:

A virtual copy must be submitted by 5pm EST on April 30, 2024. The link to this submission is at the bottom of this page.

key Dates

Launch of CSC 2024 – October 31, 2023

Due Date – April 30, 2024

Review and Selection by Committee – May 15, 2024

Winners Announced – May 20, 2024

DSI Space Access Conference Mention – June 5th and 6th, 2024

Awards

The SmallSat Alliance (SSA) is made up of over 50+ member companies. The winning students/teams of students will have access to the leading small sat companies (both large and small) that are looking for bright young professionals to work on these exciting space challenges. In addition to the three cash prize awards, this is an opportunity to impress these companies for future employment after graduation.

  • First Place – $2,000, SSA website/email network feature, and article spotlight
  • Second Place – $1,000 and SSA website/email network feature
  • Third Place – $500 and SSA website/email network feature
  • Honorable Mention – SSA website/email network feature

Other FAQ's

Who can participate?
Students may participate as individuals or as teams (up to 5 people per team). All students must be undergraduate or graduate level, from US-based or accredited universities and junior colleges.

What is included in the page count?
There is a limit of 15 pages double spaced size 12 font for the main body of the Design Submission. It must contain the following sections.

  • Problem Statement and Background
  • Solutions (Literature) Review
  • Approach to Design Challenge
  • Leveraging the Small Sat Community
  • Scale-Up Strategy
  • Policy Contexts
  • Implications of Design Approach

What is not included in the page count?
Appendix and Bibliography are not included in final page count.
Graphics are not included in final page count (add pages as necessary for number of graphics, tables, etc.)

Why is the CSC different from 2023 to 2024?
Last year, in its inaugural year of the CSC, the Small Sat Alliance took in lessons learned and recalibrated the design challenge to be more straightforward and approach a greater number of students/future space leaders.

Event POCs

  • csc@smallsatalliance.org
  • Sariah Fischer – sariah@smallsatalliance.org 
  • Alexandra Bryson – alexandra@smallsatalliance.org
  • Ben Kron – ben@smallsatalliance.org

Coming Soon...

Previous CSC Winners

2023

2023 Collegiate Space Competition winners Nicholas Heard, Christopher Renfro, Chan Mondole, Colin Madden and Melissa Sells (not pictured) were recognized by SmallSat Alliance Chairman Charles Beames, Chief of Staff Alexandra Bryson, Director of Partnerships Sariah Fischer and joined by University of Texas professor Adam Nokes and Emergent Technologies CEO George Davis at an awards ceremony on Aug. 15, 2023. 

SpaceNews Article Coverage on 2023 First Place Team

2024 

2024 Collegiate Space Competition winners Nicholas Leung  and Anisa Chowdhury from Boston University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, finished first place in this year’s CSC. 

SpaceNews Article Coverage on 2024 First Place Team

 The SmallSat Alliance is managed by a small, agile, purpose-built management company called Lynx Strategy Group